SUNY Geneseo Department of Mathematics
Monday, March 6
Math 239 01
Spring 2017
Prof. Doug Baldwin
Wednesday, March 8
Covers material since the first exam, mainly proof techniques (e.g., contrapositive, biconditionals, contradiction, cases, induction) but maybe also contexts such as congruence. See chapters 3 and 4, and problem sets 5 - 8.
Expect 3 - 4 questions, probably focusing more on proofs than in exam 1. Otherwise similar in style and rules to exam 1, especially open-references but closed person.
I leave right after the exam Wednesday.
But Nicole would like your help for the Friday class...
Example. Finish proving that for all n, Fn < 2n.
Last time we showed two basis cases, namely that F1 = 1 < 2 = 21 and F2 = 1 < 4 = 22.
We started an inductive step by assuming that Fi < 2i for all 1 ≤ i ≤ k, and by trying to show that Fk+1 < 2k+1. We got as far as realizing that Fk+1 = Fk + Fk-1 < 2k + 2k-1. Now what? Fk+1 = Fk + Fk-1 < 2k + 2k-1 = 2k-1(2 + 1) = 3 2k-1 < 4 2k-1 = 2k+1. QED
Example (a rigorous proof of an extended version of Sundstrom’s Theorem 3.28). Prove that if a ≡ b (mod n), then for all non-negative integers m, am ≡ bm (mod n).
Relevant reading ideas or questions?
Proof by induction on m.
Basis step: m = 0. Show that if a ≡ b (mod n), then a0 ≡ b0 (mod n). The congruence holds because a0 = b0 = 1, and 1 ≡ 1 (mod n).
Induction step: Assume ak ≡ bk (mod n) and show ak+1 ≡ bk+1 (mod n). {scratch work: hmm, ak+1 = a ak, similarly for b; maybe this can provide a connection between the induction hypothesis and what we want to show.} We know from this theorem’s hypothesis that a ≡ b (mod n), and from the induction hypothesis that ak ≡ bk (mod n), so from part B of Theorem 3.28 {reminder: part B says that if x ≡ y (mod n) and w ≡ z (mod n) then xw ≡ yz (mod n)} we have that a ak ≡ b bk (mod n), or in other words that ak+1 ≡ bk+1 (mod n).
Example (extended and strong induction). Prove that for sufficiently large n, Fn > (√2)n. We didn’t do this in class, but it could be an interesting exercise for the reader. Combined with the strong induction example from earlier it shows that the Fibonacci numbers lie between two simple exponential functions. This new example also requires a combination of extended induction and strong induction, with the extended induction having a less trivial basis case than the previous example did.
(After break)
Operations on sets
Read section 5.1