SUNY Geneseo Department of Mathematics
Monday, October 25
INTD 105 17
Fall 2021
Prof. Doug Baldwin
(No.)
Your suggestions, and my responses, to the midsemester surveys as of this morning.
I’ll try to check in on these periodically through the rest of the semester if you want to add anything.
4 point grading scale, more nuance at the upper end would be better. It’s not practical to change the grading scale in the middle of the course, but this is something to think about for the future (so maybe if you take a course with me later you’ll reap the benefit of whoever made this suggestion). But things I need to resolve before I do this include equity (making sure that higher grades don’t partly reflect whether you went to a strong high school, have more than the usual amount of time to work on essays, etc.) and subjectivity (if there are too many possible grades, differences between them are subjective).
Classes that “just go over homework.” I agree with this, although some classes that seem to just go over readings (e.g., some of the discussions of Enigma or maybe “The Gold Bug”) might be that way because very few people seem to be ready to talk about the readings. You have the power to make those classes more interesting by saying what you think of a reading, idea, etc.
Meetings re draft & final essays (2 people said this). I definitely agree that this is an important part of this course, and will definitely keep doing it.
Classes that present new material or practice things learned in readings. I’ll try to do as much of this as I can.
Final essay grades should replace draft grades. To some extent they do, considering that your “average” grades are averages of only the most recent grade and the highest 2 previous ones. So if final versions of essays generally get higher grades than drafts do, those higher grades will push lower ones out of the averages. And if final essays don’t get higher grades than drafts do, it’s probably in your interest for the final versions not to replace the drafts grade-wise.
The “average of most recent and highest 2 previous” scheme is deliberately constructed to make the mastery grading scheme focus on the best work you do all semester, with a little bit of concern for keeping up with new material.
Based on “Defining Plagiarism” and “Avoiding Plagiarism” in “Conventions of College Writing.”
Claim: the World Wide Web is rife with apparent plagiarism.
Exercise: find a Web page on any topic you like that a reasonably large number of people are likely to write about. Then pick a distinctive phrase from it, copy and paste that phrase into your search bar, and see how many other pages also use it.
What did you find?
Is what you’re finding plagiarism?
Yes, it meets the definition of using someone else’s words without attribution
What if what’s being reused is the author’s own words, e.g., the same person wrote two or more different Web pages?
It’s still “self-plagiarism,” i.e., not acknowledging that things you write or say in one context have already appeared in another.
Is what you’re finding a problem? Why or why not?
The standard answer for why plagiarism is a problem is that academia largely runs on trust, i.e., people learning new ideas from someone else need to trust that those ideas are really new and really do come from the source they seem to.
But beyond this, there are lots of other reasons why the plagiarism you’re seeing on the Web causes problems:
Peer editing of Enigma draft essays.
In class.